Now so many know

Now so many people know about the contents of this blog. Well, we can see how God is at work then. Hopefully, the Lord's promise of 2 Peter 3:9 will hold still "The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance."


Anyway I am going away for two weeks. Work and enjoy life at the same time. Wish all you readers a good walk with God in all things

Another plagiarised article or can it be vice versa?

Another copied article, all from Derek Prince Ministiries. Or will KH tell us that Derek Prince copied from him? The prayer and the main points are from different sites. If copied that means he canot claim as his insights right? Some more the article is also in Kong Hee's book "Renewing Your Spiritual Life in 90 days, Vol 1" day 55, "Jesus broke every curse." The book is alreayd sold in public for money so how can he say claim "The Daily Devotion on this website is non commercial in nature and meant solely for the believer’s personal edification." 

http://www.konghee.com/www/2010/05/jesus-broke-every-curse/

http://www.dpmuk.org/Mobile/default.aspx?article_id=109267

http://www.porn-free.org/prayers_occult.htm

Is serial plagiarism a sign of bondage?

More Plagiarism by Man of God?

Wahhh, another plagiarised article. Look at Kong Hee's article http://www.konghee.com/www/2009/07/the-holiness-of-god/.  The first two points is also word for word copy of this article here http://deborahshank.blogspot.com/2007/10/holiness-101.html.


And then look at KH's article point 4 "God’s holiness cannot tolerate sin". It is directly copied from the study notes of Life Application Study Bible Isa 59:1-14. You can check your Life Application Study Bible if you don't wanna believe me. The proof is also here http://www.abible.com/devotions/2005/20050502-1812.html. If he copy from others wholesale, can he say that they are his insights. Because he printed this artincle in his book "Renewing your spiritual life, Vol 2, day 76. Doctor of theology should know the importance of crediting the source of your information. Any seminary will be very strict about plagiarism.


I have posted pictures of the website articles here to make things easy for you. So how? Furthermore, in this article KH says "we must never use unholy means to teach a holy goal because..." What do you think? Is plagiarism unholy? legal maybe but defintely cannot call it holy. Will a man of God follow man's laws or God's laws

Plagiarism again?

Wahhh is the Man of God still copying? See here
http://www.konghee.com/www/2010/05/godly-sorrow/


This first half is definitely similar to Neil Anderson's devotional. http://www.crosswalk.com/devotionals/dailyinchrist/544432/

Too many paragraphs are word for word copy. What do you think? Will the world-renowned Neil Anderspn plagiarise another man's work? Some more KH can talk about repentance and godly sorrow? he already known to plagiarise before so he should walk the talk and repent right? Some more this article is also found in KH's book sold at S$14/ "Renewing Your Spiritual Life Vol 2" Day 46 Page 99. If he borrows another man's article, can he claim that he is "sharing his insights from the Bible" (his claim on back page of book?)

Did Man of God plagiarise his Devotion article from Internet or vice versa?

This is one example of plagiarism that takes the cake. LOL. Kong Hee's article is found in two different places.

This is Kong Hee's article http://www.konghee.com/www/2010/03/receiving-kingdom-power/

Look at his three points on the Holy Spirit and compare with the three points found in the Christian Cowboy's web article http://www.silveradocowboychurch.org/holyspirit.htm... Very, very similar in the words and points given. If God is a creative God, why does he need to give the same revelation in same words to two different people.

Now look at Kong Hee's 4 application points at his article's end. 1st, 2nd & 4th is directly taken from the commentary of the Spirit-filled Bible, almost word for word. The article can be seen here although I have posted the screenshot also
http://www.ruachfellowship.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=88

So how? What do you think? Who do you think copy from who? Anyway we know KH has copied from the Leadership Bible for sure.

This article is also day 70 devotion of Kong Hee's book "Renewing your Spiritual Life... Vol 1 (Page 149)". So how? Should a man sell bread that is baked by another person? Can a Christian apportion for himself manna collected by another man?

Why Must Man of God Plagiarize Another Man's Work

Another example of pastors plagiartizing from others.

Kong Hee's devotion on fasting is found here

The other article from AgapeFellowship in USA is found in their 31-day Fasting Manual in here ...

This manual is actually a very comprehensive manual on fasting. It contains prayer topics for your fasting days, foods to avoid, foods to compliment your fast, scriptures to meditate on. The pastor must have put a lot of research into it.

So how? what do you think? Both pastors seem to be experts on fasting. So why does one pastor need to copy the other's devotional article. During his fasting, God never reveal anything to him mehh? Some more one is a fasting manual. So which is the 'expert' that plagiarize from the original expert? Difficult to guess or not?

Another example of Christian pastors who plagiarize each other

Why do Christian pastors need to plagiarise other Christians' work? I believe every pastor will seek the joy of God's company in devotion every morning. So that means he should be having a fresh revelation from God every morning. They why copy others' devotion writing? Is it because for the plagiarist pastor "In those days the word of the LORD was rare; there were not many visions."? It is scary when a man claim to be a man of God but has tro resort to copy another man's revelation from God.

Just see this example. Look at this artcile, 'The Charismatic Gifts' by the megachurch pastor Kong Hee http://www.konghee.com/www/2010/05/the-charismatic-gifts-2/. It is a word for word copy of http://donfran.multiply.com/journal/item/54/The_Charismatic_Gifts...

WHO COPY FROM WHO? Makes no difference. The question is why they cannot credit the source of their article if they copied it. Why cannot they write their own revelation from God.