Thursday, April 21, 2011
The truth will be here soon
GE is on 7 May. After that, the truth will be revealed. See what happens in August. You heard about it, here first.
Thursday, March 31, 2011
Jesus was rich? ROFL hahahaha
I wonder how is it that some churches can have teachers who dare to teach that Jesus was rich, not poor. I wonder why some sheep can really live up to their names and be that stupid to believe such teachings. No wonder they get fleeced, metaphorically speaking.
This is their reasoning. He had a treasurer who even stole and keep stealing without anyone noticing the difference. They met in his house. He was presented with treasures from wise men when He was born. His clothes He wore were divided by the guards.
He had a treasurer? Please lahhh, it was the tradition in those days for one person to hold the money for the band of companions. It was not Jesus’ money that Judas held but everyone in the travelling party. Its like when we were young, we went out as friends and we would all give to one person who would then pay the expenses for all.
Did Jesus have any money? Look at Luke 8:1-3 “After this, Jesus traveled about from one town and village to another, proclaiming the good news of the kingdom of God. The Twelve were with him, and also some women who had been cured of evil spirits and diseases: Mary (called Magdalene) from whom seven demons had come out; Joanna the wife of Cuza, the manager of Herod's household; Susanna; and many others. These women were helping to support them out of their own means.” If Jesus was rich, that means he must have been very unprincipled to live off these women when he had money.
He had a house? Big deal! It just means he was not homeless not that he was rich. How big was Jesus' house? How lucrative was being a carpenter? Being a carpenter was more like being a labourer than being a businessman. The rich of Jesus’ time were the businessman merchants and traders. The rest were just labourers.
He was presented with treasures? How much did he get? If Jesus was rich, why would he say the Son of Man had no place to rest his head? Did he wear fine clothes? Really?
The soldiers tossed lots for his clothes? It was a tradition of that time for the executioners to cast lots for the condemned's belongings much like an executioner's fee. The soldiers were not doing it because they had been squabbling over who gets his rich clothes. Does anyone think that whatever robe Jesus had that perhaps it could even have been the purple robe that Herod draped over him and not Jesus' own?
The clearest evidence is that his parents were poor despite the claims that he got treasure from the Magi. Look at Luke 2:22-24. Jesus’ parents offered a sacrifice of “a pair of doves or two young pigeons”. Look at Lev 12:7b-8, “These are the regulations for the woman who gives birth to a boy or a girl. If she cannot afford a lamb, she is to bring two doves or two young pigeons, one for a burnt offering and the other for a sin offering.” Jesus' parents could not even afford a proper sacrifice of a lamb even at his birth. So Jesus’ parents were poor and he was poor.
Please lahhh, Christians, God has given you a sound mind. Don’t embarrass God’s gift to you by not using it.
This is their reasoning. He had a treasurer who even stole and keep stealing without anyone noticing the difference. They met in his house. He was presented with treasures from wise men when He was born. His clothes He wore were divided by the guards.
He had a treasurer? Please lahhh, it was the tradition in those days for one person to hold the money for the band of companions. It was not Jesus’ money that Judas held but everyone in the travelling party. Its like when we were young, we went out as friends and we would all give to one person who would then pay the expenses for all.
Did Jesus have any money? Look at Luke 8:1-3 “After this, Jesus traveled about from one town and village to another, proclaiming the good news of the kingdom of God. The Twelve were with him, and also some women who had been cured of evil spirits and diseases: Mary (called Magdalene) from whom seven demons had come out; Joanna the wife of Cuza, the manager of Herod's household; Susanna; and many others. These women were helping to support them out of their own means.” If Jesus was rich, that means he must have been very unprincipled to live off these women when he had money.
He had a house? Big deal! It just means he was not homeless not that he was rich. How big was Jesus' house? How lucrative was being a carpenter? Being a carpenter was more like being a labourer than being a businessman. The rich of Jesus’ time were the businessman merchants and traders. The rest were just labourers.
He was presented with treasures? How much did he get? If Jesus was rich, why would he say the Son of Man had no place to rest his head? Did he wear fine clothes? Really?
The soldiers tossed lots for his clothes? It was a tradition of that time for the executioners to cast lots for the condemned's belongings much like an executioner's fee. The soldiers were not doing it because they had been squabbling over who gets his rich clothes. Does anyone think that whatever robe Jesus had that perhaps it could even have been the purple robe that Herod draped over him and not Jesus' own?
The clearest evidence is that his parents were poor despite the claims that he got treasure from the Magi. Look at Luke 2:22-24. Jesus’ parents offered a sacrifice of “a pair of doves or two young pigeons”. Look at Lev 12:7b-8, “These are the regulations for the woman who gives birth to a boy or a girl. If she cannot afford a lamb, she is to bring two doves or two young pigeons, one for a burnt offering and the other for a sin offering.” Jesus' parents could not even afford a proper sacrifice of a lamb even at his birth. So Jesus’ parents were poor and he was poor.
Please lahhh, Christians, God has given you a sound mind. Don’t embarrass God’s gift to you by not using it.
Monday, February 14, 2011
Sunday, January 9, 2011
Prophecy of Sun's return
I heard that Sun Ho has returned to SG and to CHC and has abandoned her Hollywood career. Is that true? If so its amazing. Thats because it looks like Sun's return to CHC has been prophesied in Kong Hee's blog itself. This is what I copied from the responses to Kong Hee's post on "Wholesome Shallowness"
The post is by a hokkien-speaking Michaellow on October 27, 2009 at 1:05 pm
"Ehhehehehehe, now 37, almost reach expiry date for dance artistes. In 2years, when got $40, no change, and CDs not selling, will come back to church and then say “God called me back to ministry of singing.” Lai dat how to lose ahhhh?"
Translated into English
"hehehe, (she is) now 37 and has almost reached (the) expiry date for dance artistes. In two years, when she she reaches 40 years old and her CDs are not selling well, (she) will come back to church and say "God called me back to ministry of singing."
SH should be 40 years old this year. So it looks like even an unschooled, ordinary man can be used to prophesy. But then weren't Peter and John also described as unschooled and ordinary in Acts 5. LOL
Posted on 30 March 2011 : Looks like this prophecy is fulfilled. Check this post #102 here http://forums.asiaone.com/showthread.php?t=37801&page=11&highlight=city+harvest
All the multi-milions ending up as the fruit of folly, chasing vainglory. This is the illustration mentioned in James 5:5, "You have lived on earth in luxury and self-indulgence. You have fattened yourselves in the day of slaughter." What a man or woman sows, so shall he/she reap.
The post is by a hokkien-speaking Michaellow on October 27, 2009 at 1:05 pm
"Ehhehehehehe, now 37, almost reach expiry date for dance artistes. In 2years, when got $40, no change, and CDs not selling, will come back to church and then say “God called me back to ministry of singing.” Lai dat how to lose ahhhh?"
Translated into English
"hehehe, (she is) now 37 and has almost reached (the) expiry date for dance artistes. In two years, when she she reaches 40 years old and her CDs are not selling well, (she) will come back to church and say "God called me back to ministry of singing."
SH should be 40 years old this year. So it looks like even an unschooled, ordinary man can be used to prophesy. But then weren't Peter and John also described as unschooled and ordinary in Acts 5. LOL
Posted on 30 March 2011 : Looks like this prophecy is fulfilled. Check this post #102 here http://forums.asiaone.com/showthread.php?t=37801&page=11&highlight=city+harvest
All the multi-milions ending up as the fruit of folly, chasing vainglory. This is the illustration mentioned in James 5:5, "You have lived on earth in luxury and self-indulgence. You have fattened yourselves in the day of slaughter." What a man or woman sows, so shall he/she reap.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)